Monday, May 20, 2013

SSS coverage for workers in wellness spa, beauty salon, fitness gym sought

A lawmaker is determined to shepherd a measure mandating the compulsory inclusion of thousands of barbers, haircutters or hairstylists, manicurists or pedicurists, make-up artists or beauty professionals, masseuse, reflexologists or therapists and gym trainers, fitness instructors or dieticians in the coverage of the Social Security System (SSS).

Rep. Raymond Democrito Mendoza (Party-list, TUCP) is hopeful that the proposal, which removes the workers in wellness spas, beauty salons and fitness gyms from the category of self-employed, will ultimately be enacted into law in the next Congress.

The proposal is contained in House Bill 1558, which was authored by Mendoza. It is pending in the House Committee on Government Enterprises and Privatization.

In pushing for the proposal, Mendoza noted the recent growth of wellness centers, which, more often than not, are an amalgamation of beauty and grooming salons, fitness gyms, spas and massage parlors and other interrelated services.
"The industry is the bread and butter of thousands of workers in wellness spas, beauty salons and fitness gyms. Most of these are 'experts' in their individual fields who have undergone professional training. However, in most instances, the services of these persons are merely outsourced by the wellness centers. They are not employed but are treated as independent contractors," Mendoza said.

Mendoza said these workers lease the facilities of the centers and bring their own set of clients. Their compensation or payment is based on a per head basis and they earn a commission or share in the payments due their clients.

He added that they are not required to observe office hours or report to the company every day. They are not devoting their time exclusively for one company and are free to work on any other wellness facility, or engage in any other employment.

"One of the predicaments of these workers is their membership in the SSS. With the above-mentioned arrangement, they are considered as self-employed. Thus, they pay their entire SSS membership dues and there is no one to pay the heftier employer counterpart," Mendoza said.

According to Mendoza, the vision of the measure is to compel owners of the wellness center, barbershop, salon, spa, massage parlor, fitness gym or any other similar entity to which they are affiliated or regularly report to render their services which are considered as their employer to deduct and withhold from the concerned person's average monthly commissions, earnings, compensation or payment, his/her employee's contribution, as well as pay for and remit the counterpart employer's contribution.

"By doing this, these persons would be able to continue being an active SSS member and reap the benefits, while still working or upon their retirement," Mendoza stressed.

The measure amends Section 9-A of Republic Act 1161, as amended, otherwise known as the “Social Security Law,” by compulsory including, irrespective of the contractual arrangement of their non-recognition as employees, or of the kind or source of the commissions, earnings, compensation or payment for their services, barbers, haircutters or hairstylists; manicurists or pedicurists; make-up artists; masseuse, reflexologists or therapists and gym trainers, fitness instructors or dieticians, and shall not be considered under the category of self-employed.

"The State affirms labor as a primary social economic force. It shall protect the rights of workers and promote their welfare. The social security of workers in the wellness centers, beauty and grooming salons, fitness gyms, spas and massage parlors, and other interrelated services should always be protected and promoted," Mendoza said. - Lorelei V. Castillo, Media Relations Service-PRIB

Saturday, May 4, 2013

Solon seeks increased separation pay for employees terminated due to disease

A lawmaker is seeking an increase of separation pay of workers given the pink slip due to sickness.

Rep. Raymond Democrito C. Mendoza (Party-list, TUCP) said employees terminated due to disease should be treated with compassion and differently from other causes.
"The reason is obvious. An employee terminated due to such a disease will no longer be able to find gainful employment as compared to those who were terminated due o redundancy and related causes," Mendoza said.

Mendoza cited Article 283 of the Labor Code of the Philippines which states that the employer may terminate employment or reduce the total number of personnel due to installation of labor saving devices, among others.

"On the other hand, Article 284 of the Labor Code of the Philippines or Presidential Decree No. 442 allows termination on the ground of disease," he said.

Mendoza said in all the said instances of authorized causes of termination, the separation pay ranges from payment of half (1/2) month to one-month salary for every year of service.

House Bill 893 seeks the increase of separation pay of employees terminated due to disease to at least six months salary or two months salary for every year of service, whichever is greater.

Likewise, the bill institutionalizes the issuance of a certification by a competent public health authority that the disease is of such nature or at such stage that it cannot be cured within a period of six months even with proper medical treatment before an employee can be terminated for this cause.

The bill further mandates that should the employee terminated on such ground regain his health, he shall be entitled to his former position without loss of seniority. - Ma. Victoria I. Palomar, Media Relations Service