High time for PH to end wage-regionalization and wage-setting at barest minimum rate

File photo

TO REALIZE the national vision of every Filipino living a life of dignity and enjoying quality standard of living as a matter of right, the 1987 Constitution directed the State to provide labor full protection and ensure the right of workers and their families to a living wage.

Regrettably, from the time the Constitution was ratified up to the present, the issue on living wage has never been addressed; one administration after the other deviated instead toward “wage-regionalization.” This consequently created wide gaps in wage levels all over the country.

Meanwhile, the wage-setting practice drifted toward containing the wages to the barest minimum, seeking the lowest level of balance in every region where the market clearing price of labor was primarily determined on the basis of employer’s capacity to pay rather than on the worker’s right to a living wage. The same problem exists in the public sector despite the salary standardization program.

This has created the condition for chronic poverty in the country, which has further deepened inequality as millions of workers are consigned to sustaining their families on wages that can hardly meet even half of the daily cost of living.

We, at Nagkaisa—a coalition of 47 labor federations, workers organizations in the private and public sectors, and urban and peasant groups—therefore, welcome the current administration’s plan to nationalize minimum wage, as announced recently by Labor Secretary Silvestre Bello. Indeed, there clearly is a need to rectify the deformed policy of regionalizing minimum wages.

However, a major government pronouncement remains a propaganda if left without form at the policy level. That, certainly, is what happened to the living wage principle that has lain lifeless in the Constitution for the last three decades. But with the new administration’s pledge to rectify the errors of previous administrations, Nagkaisa and the government can work together in achieving our common goal of stopping contractualization and realizing the living wage.

At this point, Nagkaisa gladly presumes that the Duterte administration remains committed to the principle of living wage and that its planned nationalization of minimum wage will ultimately lead to the realization of this goal. Workers, in the first place, deserve not a minimum wage but a fair share in the product of their labor.

Hence, encouraged by the announcement of Secretary Bello, Nagkaisa calls on Malacañang to issue an order directing all regional wage boards to set a uniform minimum wage based on the Metro Manila rate. At the same time, we call on President Duterte to certify as urgent a bill seeking the same and the repeal of the existing Wage Rationalization Act.

Nagkaisa also calls for a uniform application and implementation of the Salary Standardization Law among all local government units. Nagkaisa strongly believes in the principle of equal pay for equal work and work of equal value, not just for private sector workers but also for government employees who are in the same bind.

It is high time the Philippines ended wage-regionalization and -setting at the barest minimum. Nagkaisa believes this can be done, especially with government treating the labor movement as its main partner in this enormous reform endeavor.

—NAGKAISA (47 labor federations and workers organizations both in the private and public sectors) - By @inquirerdotnet

Labor unions press end to contractualization

File photo

THE country’s biggest group of labor unions pressed for the total ban on contractualization scheme as it rejected the short-term hiring of workers for being illegal.

The Associated Labor Unions (ALU), through spokesperson Alan Tanjusay, on Sunday said short-term employment contracts, either through direct hiring by employers or through sub-contracting, violates Articles 106 to 109, Article 259, and Articles 294 to 296 of the Labor Code.

Leaders of ALU, along with Nagkaisa (Solidarity), an alliance of labor federations and workers’ organizations, and other labor groups are set to meet with Labor Secretary Silvestre Bello 3rd this week for another round of consultative discussions on the implementation of the President’s directive to put a stop to contractualization.

Earlier, Trade Secretary Ramon Lopez proposed to end the contractualization scheme through the regularization of employees by manpower and recruitment agencies instead of the principal employer.

But Tanjusay pointed out that Lopez’s proposal is not acceptable because there is nothing in the law that allows it.

“This is not what our President Duterte has said in his vow to workers. The President has said to end contractualization, period. What Mr. Lopez and the employers’ lobby group are proposing now is still a form of contractualization and we strongly oppose it,” Tanjusay said.

ALU and its allied groups also called for a ban on all fixed-term employment and the repeal of all department orders that allows contractual work schemes .

The group said all employees should be regularized after the six-month probationary period as mandated by law.

“Labor groups have been lenient with government and employers by allowing them to have more flexibility in the past several decades. During these periods, employers’ profits improved and the country’s wealth developed. But workers’ and their families, who helped built that profit and wealth, are getting poorer because contractualization deprived them of their right to proper wages, adequate social protection and safe and healthy workplace,” Tanjusay pointed out.

Earlier, the militant Bukluran ng Manggagawang Pilipino (BMP) and its allied organizations dubbed Henry Sy as the country’s “King of Contractual Labor.” - By William Depasupil, The Manila Times